Skip to main content

PDF


Title: Criteria for WFD Groundwater Good 'Quantitative Status' and a framework for the assessment of groundwater abstractions
Author: SNIFFER
Author: SNIFFER
Document Type: Monograph
Annotation: Environment Agency Project ID:EAPRJOUT_1357, Representation ID: 457, Object ID: 2529
Abstract:
WFD53: Development of a Framework for Determining the Regulatory Standards for Groundwater Abstractions (September, 2005). Final Report: Criteria for WFD Groundwater aGood Quantitative Statusa and a Framework for the Assessment of Groundwater Abstractions. Project funders/partners: SNIFFER, Environment Agency, Geological Survey of Ireland. Background to research The aim of this project was to determine a framework to evaluate the criteria for Water Framework Directive (WFD) agood quantitative statusa within each groundwater body and a further framework to assess applications groundwater abstractions to maintain good status. The WFD explicitly states that member states should ensure a balance between the abstraction and recharge of groundwater and implicitly establishes the need for member states to regulate groundwater abstractions through an assessment and control regime. It is intended that outcomes from the project concerning the criteria for good status have application throughout the UK and Ireland. Subsequent recommendations regarding an appropriate assessment framework and tools are intended for application in Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland and are tailored as appropriate for the hydrogeological environments and legislative regimes in these countries. Objectives of the Research The objectives of the research were to set the criteria for good groundwater quantitative status and to develop a regulatory assessment framework. These objectives were subdivided into the following phases: a An assessment of the criteria for good quantitative status based on the Directive and associated guidance; a A review and critical evaluation of existing methodologies internationally and within the UK; a Proposals for the criteria to determine good groundwater status; and the a Development of a comprehensive framework for the assessment of applications for groundwater abstraction. Key Findings and Recommendations Criteria for Good Quantitative Status An international review concluded that many countries use a regional or aquifer specific agroundwater management plana rather than applying a aone system fits alla approach. This avoids the over-regulation of aminora aquifers and focuses management on aquifers with hydraulic properties which can allow over exploitation in areas where abstraction pressures are greatest. Based on the WFD and UKTAG Guidance five tests were proposed as the criteria for groundwater good quantitative status: i SNIFFER WFD53 Criteria for Groundwater Good Quantitative Status and a Framework for Groundwater Abstraction Assessment September, 2005 Test 1: That the total abstraction from the groundwater body should not exceed the recharge to the groundwater body, after an allowance for dependent ecosystems if no assessment of these has been possible. Test 2: That groundwater abstraction should not cause a reversal in groundwater flow direction which results in the significant intrusion of saline or other poor quality water into the groundwater body. Test 3: That groundwater flows to dependent surface water bodies should not be diminished by groundwater body related pressures to the extent that they do not achieve good status, or that their status is reduced from high to good. Test 4: That groundwater body related pressures should not diminish groundwater flows or levels supporting groundwater dependent terrestrial ecosystems (GWDTEs) such that these ecosystems suffer asignificant damagea in relation to conservation objectives. Test 5: That a review of available groundwater level monitoring data is conducted. Groundwater levels, on their own, rarely provide a reliable indication of quantitative status in relation to the groundwater body scale balance between abstraction and recharge but may be helpful in investigating potential abstraction impacts on GWDTE receptors. Indicators of the confidence in the status assessment are presented in Table 6 of the report, based on consideration of all the available evidence. Framework for the Assessment of Groundwater Abstractions Assessment of applications for groundwater abstraction must aim to avoid a deterioration in quantitative status and to permit good status to be maintained or achieved. A Good Status classification of a groundwater body does not automatically permit abstractions where these would result in unacceptable stress to surface water bodies or groundwater dependent terrestrial ecosystems, or cause saline intrusion. Equally, Poor Status does not preclude groundwater abstractions where it can be demonstrated that the proposed abstraction does not increase the stress which resulted in the Poor Status classification. The assessment of groundwater abstraction should be based on the criteria for determining quantitative status (summarised above). Additional criteria also include practical considerations (e.g. borehole yield), impacts on other abstractors or receptors, socio-economic considerations, consultation and sustainability assessments. The level of assessment of an application (i.e. detail, site investigation and time required) should be linked to the risks it poses and the consequent confidence required in the predicted impacts. A GIS based desk-study is recommended as a first screening tool for all abstraction applications. Further site specific assessment, including water features surveys, pumping tests and, in some cases, numerical groundwater modelling may be required which must be scoped according to the local risks and hydrogeology. Simple examples of application of the groundwater abstraction assessment framework to contrasting groundwater bodies in Scotland and England are presented. Key words: GROUNDWATER, ABSTRACTIONS, WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE ii SNIFFER WFD53 Criteria for Groundwater Good Quantitative Status and a Framework for Groundwater Abstraction Assessment September, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1 1.1 Introduction to the Project 1 1.2 Project Objectives 2 1.3 Layout of This Report 2 1.4 2
Publisher: Environment Agency
Subject Keywords: Water framework directive; Groundwater; Wfd; Water; Abstract
Extent: 96
Permalink: http://www.environmentdata.org/archive/ealit:4691
Total file downloads: 0

Download PDF    Display PDF in separate tab